Editorial Policy

Our goal is to publish readable and accurate daily history stories that give readers useful context.

Selection Criteria

• Events are selected for historical relevance, educational value, and date alignment.
• We prioritize specific events over broad, vague topics.
• We avoid sensational framing and focus on context, evidence, and impact.

Research and Sourcing

• Drafts are built from publicly accessible references and historical documentation.
• Claims with weak support are removed or clearly qualified.
• Where practical, articles include source references for reader verification.

Fact Checking

• Dates, locations, names, and outcomes are checked before publication.
• Conflicting source claims are noted, narrowed, or omitted.
• We do not intentionally publish fabricated quotes or falsified attributions.

Style and Presentation

• Articles are written in plain language for general readers.
• We separate narrative context from uncertain interpretation.
• Headlines are written to describe the event, not to mislead.

AI and Automation Use

• Automation tools may assist drafting and formatting steps.
• Human review is required before publication.
• We review for factual clarity, readability, and policy compliance.

Corrections and Updates

• Readers can report errors through the contact page.
• Verified corrections are applied promptly.
• Substantive updates may include revised context or source links.

Independence and Advertising

Editorial decisions are made independently. Advertising relationships do not control historical topic selection, factual conclusions, or correction decisions.